Wars of Actium

DeletedUser12660

Guest
Wars of Actium​

300.jpg

Massacres​

Trash Talk vs. Stealthy Pandas 23-2

Trash Talk vs. The Saints 19-1

Bundle of Sticks(Undefeated) vs. The Illuminati 18-0!!

Bundle of Sticks vs. The Plague Co. 7-0

Bundle of Sticks vs. The Bish 8-0

Talk Trash vs. Super Duper 7-0

Talk Trash vs Mountain Warriors 17-1

Talk Trash vs. Primal Concrete Sledge (Worst Name) 7-0

Candy Crush vs. Impervious Syndicate/Impervious Legion 27-1!!​
​


Major Wars​

Impervious Syndicate vs. -DOOM/-MAYHEM 20-6

DAUNTLESS vs. -DOOM 10-5

KingsGuard vs Talk Trash 4-1

Unsullied vs. Deadly when Sober 4-1

The Plague Co. vs. The Bish 2-4

Final Outcome​
Trash Talk W vs. Stealthy Pandas L
​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser4951

Guest
Trash Talk Vs Stealthy Pandas
6-2 with 2 more Pandas cities in siege.
 

DeletedUser12660

Guest
Im trying to figure out how to get the info of the conquests without grepostats. Since its not updatedwith the world Actium yet.
 

DeletedUser13100

Guest
[report]fc40190a1466a4fc6f35636d21aa82fe[/report]
[report]5745df9a0bb9c3d2fc830fa55c7c9d20[/report]
[report]ec3d3d38c232e5dd36128041c1436aca[/report]
[report]28d0ca71339045c3fff67f43282cfadb[/report]
[report]3e0d955b540674447a50281c89113a53[/report]
[report]be5aa1e79e0069498eba3c8147c5134e[/report]
[report]e0a4864e4810bfbf1ece86280bcd7cce[/report]
[report]1d71775186e56a26a5b460271d2e2372[/report]
[report]8028a224622c4064a63cbd9b55351113[/report]
[report]6ecb666490d52b0486f4421b632daee5[/report]
[report]0d9e4fafe213e5ed9d49753759da4fd8[/report]


copy paste this in your notes in game to see whats been done to the MRA kingsguard/boondock saints/night watch/dothraki/unsullied in an 8 hour period.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser4951

Guest
You mean Boondock Saints VS Kingsguard, NW, Doth, Unsullied?
 

DeletedUser271

Guest
No, it seems like it was Deadly When Sober against Kingsguard/Dothraki/Unsullied/NW and Higlander Pub (but no Boondock Saints though).
 

DeletedUser4951

Guest
Nope BS confirmed that they are now working with Unsullied. Gratz to Unsullied to forcing that one.
 

DeletedUser4951

Guest
Lemur, we don't have you guys red flagged :p

I'm laughing at how they think it takes 250ish players to conquer an ocean.
 

DeletedUser12660

Guest
TSF, I'm putting down any wars that contain conquers on both sides, in the top #20 alliances or related to, 3+ conquests from both sides combined and if it seems to be popping up a lot in the externals or ingame. Such as the thing mine and your alliance have going on which has attracted much popularity.

These numbers will change though
 

DeletedUser8308

Guest
MOUNTAIN WARRIORS did not win Byzantium. The highest concentration of Byzantium winners is in Checkmate.
 

DeletedUser12660

Guest
maknox said:
MOUNTAIN WARRIORS did not win Byzantium. The highest concentration of Byzantium winners is in Checkmate.
Click to expand...

They still have a few that did win. Most of which make up their top fighters and experienced players. Which can be listed as winning Byzantium. When checkmate makes this list I will add them to winning Byzantium as well.
 

DeletedUser6919

Guest
OVOKING said:
TSF, I'm putting down any wars that contain conquers on both sides, in the top #20 alliances or related to, 3+ conquests from both sides combined and if it seems to be popping up a lot in the externals or ingame. Such as the thing mine and your alliance have going on which has attracted much popularity.

These numbers will change though
Click to expand...

I'm about to give my first negitive rep for this (will do when im back yam and have access to comp) because:

1 - 3 cqs combined is not a 'major war'

2 - you only looked at the cqs of 2 teams in top 20 alliances

3 - 1 of the 'major wars' you listed only have 2 cqs combined and you stated 3 in quoted comment.

so to me this doesnt look like anything that couldnt have gone on wars thread and this is just excuss to show you took city off tt.

Give it up dude your 'war' hasnt attracted that much popularity
 

DeletedUser13106

Guest
OVOKING said:
They still have a few that did win. Most of which make up their top fighters and experienced players. Which can be listed as winning Byzantium. When checkmate makes this list I will add them to winning Byzantium as well.
Click to expand...


so with this logic there could be like 8 to 20 alliances who all get credit for winning a world. Please rethink how you list everything. I don't want to see alliances credit for 8 wins if its just because well 3 or 4 came from that world. If your going to credit it with win i would say more than half the alliance or 1/4 should be from it not 4 or 5 who are the top attackers.
 

DeletedUser12660

Guest
I dont see any of you guys doing the wars thread. Stop complaining or make your own wars thread. Love to complain, too lazy to make there own though. Go find another thread to complain about. MissPixie, back at you.
 

DeletedUser13106

Guest
Well i'm sorry but everyone complains if you can't handle it don't make your own thread.
 

DeletedUser10246

Guest
OVOKING said:
I dont see any of you guys doing the wars thread. Stop complaining or make your own wars thread. Love to complain, too lazy to make there own though. Go find another thread to complain about. MissPixie, back at you.
Click to expand...

Don't get butthurt, pixie is generally defending the nobodies and small people in here. What they are saying is follow your own guidlines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top