Sink or Swim

Ev1lK1ng

Peltast
agreed, its kinda pointless to talk sink or swim within first month.. but after new year something can be made for rough view of sink/swim
 

Oggami Itto

Lochagos
It's strange. This is the quietest forum I've ever seen. No one has anything to say. I would make one, but no one cares what I have to say, and I'm just simming in this world. Won't be long before I'm kicked.
 

Zeeker348

Lochagos
Ill keep this very short because I suck at this.

1 *Censored*: Strong team -Swim-
2 Paros Accord: Another strong team -Swim-
3 People of the Sea: Don't know much but have a few good players so -Float-
4 Art of War: Don't know much but heard they are having issues -Sink-
5 Paros Accord.: Sister alliance so -merge- or die
6 =SKYNET=: Probably second best team -Swim-
7 MOUNTAIN WARRIORS: Has good players but also has some issues -Float-
8 Kraken Tentacle Born: Who's this? (Haven't see or heard anything so might be an ignorant call on them) -Sink-
9 *MOUNTAIN WARRIORS*: -Merge-
10 =Psychos=: -Sink-
11 Valhalla Rising: -Sinking-
12 Sea Raiders: -Sink-
 

RussBuss

Hekatonarch
Lol, we kicked Ratchet because you guys got him in siege and he didn't say anything, we don't have room for dead weight like you guys. Taking inactives is pretty easy and I have personally taken 3 kraken cities myself. Remember jerseyjim he used to be one of your top players before I took on your alliance by myself and rimmed him. It was a good day, I made over 3k abp. I didn't even get help from my alliance. But we all have our own opinions and I don't count taking inactives. Good Job to you guys, you took cities from someone that was always going inactive and was in your core. Some of us are only proud when we win real battles, I see its different for you guys though.
 

Ev1lK1ng

Peltast
And how different is boasting about your alleged "rimming" of Jerseyjim when he was out of our core?
Either way, this is not the war but merely skirmish, real thing starts when we get closer to each others so far our cores are quite far to do aggressive and frequent sieges on both sides, besides you guys "conquring" island below us core and growing those cities will give us new blue island :p
 
Last edited:

RussBuss

Hekatonarch
The difference with Jim is he wasn't in our core, while ratchet was in yours. We are taking on PA and we are throwing some spare troops your way, nothing much. Be careful, your players aren't as loyal as they seem.
 

Ev1lK1ng

Peltast
The difference with Jim is he wasn't in our core, while ratchet was in yours. We are taking on PA and we are throwing some spare troops your way, nothing much. Be careful, your players aren't as loyal as they seem.
According to GRCRTools Jim had 2 cities in total, and lost 1 and got kicked for posting siege report of stacked siege with high walls kisses :p

P.S. You making excuses saying you are in war with multiple alliances is not necessary, but being only packed to The Eagle just because you guys are afraid of 2 single players is something to make fun of..
 

RussBuss

Hekatonarch
Lol we aren't afraid of them, we are friends, we use that as a way of saying we dont need allies. Jims wall was only 0. I remember the flyers, they hurt and I has a cs tt of 5 hours and he messaged me as soon as I attacked saying that I was a fool and that your alliance was going to stop me. I know he posted because I kept hitting his city farming the bp unless he make 1k birs appear out of thin air without your alliances help? He had 4 cities go back to a later date. But I guess you guys would rather be pacted with 40 clueless players, does that make you scared of them?
 

Ev1lK1ng

Peltast


as everyone can see, he had only 2 cities in total, and was not "top guy" in Krakens, besides you were boasting practically at nothing.. you rimmed and took on entire ally by your self what are you blabbing about?
This game surely does miss guys like you to make it more interesting :cool:
Next time before you boast or try to make things up, please make sure its at least accurate and that opposing side cant counter everything you said with proof via intel sites..
and gl in making things up as we move along, you do seem good at it, please argue with intel site and try to lie to them next time :D
 

RussBuss

Hekatonarch
I stand corrected, he had 3 cities, I destroyed the other in siege. Most go by point/bp ratio, hewas one of your top guys. I killed over 1k of your birs my myself and still got the city, my timing was good during that siege. Same goes to you, you said he only had 2 cities, we were both wrong.
 

Ev1lK1ng

Peltast
I stand corrected, he had 3 cities, I destroyed the other in siege. Most go by point/bp ratio, hewas one of your top guys. I killed over 1k of your birs my myself and still got the city, my timing was good during that siege. Same goes to you, you said he only had 2 cities, we were both wrong.
Issue at hand is that you are lying mister.. we never sent anything his way, and you most probably hit air and bragged about 1 single takeover, but in reality you havent done anything yet :)