its easy to say its all equal when you mention it 3 vs 3, but it never was 3 vs 3, people are forgetting the other alliances, OB, IA, W.T.F at the time.
the big difference is location too, its not like Apoc ever could attack KT or KoD, and JG had there own war with IA which is 4 alliances. while KoD faught us, and a little of JG but mainly in 44 over land grab cities taking the alliances that fell there. KT ate dead weight in LoD until that food ran out and they turned on us attacking with rat, kod, KT, while apoc fought rat. a big difference in war is your front lines. its easy to talk big when you have only one line of cities to worry about, not 3 sides. and when some of your cities are a 8 hr travel from your closest enemy just for a revolt.
My point is you are not comparing apples to apples. But numbers dont lie. Just look at the alliance DBP/ABP rankings and who is growing. KOD talks they were hit just as hard, yet we were lower then them in DBP before this war and now as an alliance TBD is almost 10,000,000 DBP above the #2 DBP alliance which is JG. so no matter how you try and spin the friendlies and enemies no one was hit as hard as TBD, peiord. Then look at KT there DBP is pitiful, basically they have never been attacked so that tells you they arent tested and are not under any threat.
all That being said TBD's ABP as an alliance is still #1 which was all gained before the KT/KoD/Rat (and others) war, or at least most. and KoD's DBP is more then 10,000,000 DBP lower then TBD's which was mostly gained from TBD.
So there is no comparison what so ever to any of your logic in who is fighting who, it was never equal. in fact prob closest it ever was equal was when TBD and KoD where fighting.
But that all being said I do get it, it happens every world. wonders gets close and when alliances realize they have no chance beating an alliance one on one they team up. it makes sense. its kinda mother nature in a way lol. then when that "top dog" alliance breaks and falls off the threat meter, the alliances attacking are left with 2 options, look to the next threat they cant take out by them selves, or become the bigger threats second fiddle and rotate for crowns so when they leave this world they can look in the mirror and feel they had some sense of victory and feel like they "won".
me I am tired of those wins. no more rotating for me. I will lose before i play that way again. even if I am the only one with no crown at the end of this world. That will feel more like a win to me.
Dont take me the wrong way, all the respect to all the players and alliances kicking our bums and taking my cities, each one was earned, and i completely understand why everyone would feel threatened by TBD 2 months ago. but the TBD 2 months ago isnt the one today. And even tho we are losing the war i still am proud of my alliance and what we have done and still doing, most other alliances would have crawled to an enemy alliance and begged to take in the top players or merge of some sorts and we are still here fighting and thats what the game is all about.
by the way this was responding to all the recent comments lol. I am just no good at the quote thing. and lazy haha