DeletedUser11717
Guest
Now that I think about it more, this actually may be what WE wanted..
We asked to balance the game to help prevent gold abusers from well, abusing buying and using gold. And hiding behind it to make them good or even decent. This could be Grepo's way of saying "We're going to balance it out and make it a true war game. Even playing field, gold buyer or not. Everyone has a fair chance".
Which, means every world will get harder as those who ARE good without gold, will have a better chance of squashing those who aren't good (but the gold spending makes them good), and more people are able to rise up and be a dominating force.
Idk, could be something. Most the people I see complaining (outside of the EFs) are those who are only good because of the gold - i.e. they stink without it..
Better read some war books folks!
We asked to balance the game to help prevent gold abusers from well, abusing buying and using gold. And hiding behind it to make them good or even decent. This could be Grepo's way of saying "We're going to balance it out and make it a true war game. Even playing field, gold buyer or not. Everyone has a fair chance".
Which, means every world will get harder as those who ARE good without gold, will have a better chance of squashing those who aren't good (but the gold spending makes them good), and more people are able to rise up and be a dominating force.
Idk, could be something. Most the people I see complaining (outside of the EFs) are those who are only good because of the gold - i.e. they stink without it..
Better read some war books folks!