Doing something in order to win is what our alliance is supposed to do. Arguing that we were wrong to do something instead of letting you guys coast to the title is a bit crazy. Our pact was with Sea Wolves. We never had a pact or an NAP with the Blunt groups. When Sea Wolves decided to merge into Ascension then that gave our group the right to decide how our relations were going to be towards them.
Saying you were clearly the best on the server is offensive. Here's the stats from the op you guys ran last night Blunt groups ABP 88,813
The Faction groups DBP 437,227. You guys had over 100 attacks incoming at our alliance, and you never got a single revolt. Those stats are clearly slanted in the other direction showing that you were never the best group. The Faction was the best alliance on this server from the day we started in 56 and arguing differently is foolish. GrepoIntel is quite clear on this fact.
Then to argue that the hen is the reason we're going to win. How many of those myth units from last night were products of the "hen." We didn't abuse the hen, that would be your buddy FallingBrick. If we had 1 member that was willing to be competitive with him that's not abuse. That's leveling the playing field.
As far as what we do on the next server, we'll see if we're on the same server, then. However you can go back through these threads and realize that our alliance was very much against posting stuff in the external forums. We did all of our talking in-game. Obviously our misinformation on the anchors dropping off of wonder islands gave you a false sense of security. Enough to come create this post bragging about how your alliance was so much better and was going to coast to the title. Our alliance adjusted to the situation and pushed for the 4. We're the #1 Attacking Alliance on Naxos, so if we have to go bust up a wonder, then we're the best fit at doing that. We took that knowledge and decided not to freak out or overreact and we were the first group to finish a level 10.