1) Disagree. We picked up 55 Dididi cities near your wonder the last opp. We were getting more and more succesful as you were getting more and more tired.
2) It is not. And your player did not mechanically drop, he ghosted after new players weren't allowed int he game and restarted. Would have had much more respect for the move if it cost your alliance slots, as the game is attended.
3) The BS attacks (at least the ones I sent) were less so designed to lock up the game, but strategically timed (2, 12, 15 and 18 hours) to coordinate with times the revolt attacks would be picking up as well as suspected times CS' would be hitting. The design of the move is to make it impossible for good defenders to identify CS. You know that is a good strategy and part of fair play.
They changed the morale rules server wide, not directed to this world. There are constant updates on every server. The adding of heroes, the adding of quests, etc. Inno is constantly updating the game. To believe that Inno would make a server wide change cause of complaints in Baris is foolish.
There are many things Inno did that I disagree with. Changing our VM rules after the server started. Starting wonders 2 days before Christmas and changing the morale rules. That said, I feel that Mike MBA was exploiting a bug which is clearly forbidden in the players agreement. Inno did not agree with my interpretation, and hence did not issue him a penalty, but the move is borderline, at best. It is not a noble action.
That said, Inno has the right to change the game rules server wide which is what happened here. To think that the players in Baris have enough pull to make a server wide change is a massive leap and could only be accepted by the biggest conspiracy theorists. Baris is not important enough for Inno to make server wide changes.