DeletedUser
Guest
I am on here to talk about how alliances deal with diplomacy. Most alliances I have talked to have been receptive to conversations about the direction of their alliance, growth patterns and so forth, but recently due to some rapid growth and aggressive conquering I have come into contact with an alliance that feels it is best to ignore messages or not respond to them until they have a problem with you and then send a long winded accusatory (often unreasonable) message back. I find this sort of diplomacy to be very displeasing. This "diplomacy" encourages a negative response and puts me on edge when deal with this alliance as I can assume that they are planning something against me and don't want something to slip.
M question to the Gythium community is how do you handle diplomacy? do you try to be punctual with responses? How would you like to be treated when in talks with an alliance? Do you like a diplomat who is willing to have a bit of a back and forth conversation or a diplomat that ignores your messages to them (or doesn't respond) then sends you an essay when they have a problem? If you found out your diplomat handled himself this way would you keep him as your diplomat?
(the questions are hypothetical to all players who don't lead alliances)
M question to the Gythium community is how do you handle diplomacy? do you try to be punctual with responses? How would you like to be treated when in talks with an alliance? Do you like a diplomat who is willing to have a bit of a back and forth conversation or a diplomat that ignores your messages to them (or doesn't respond) then sends you an essay when they have a problem? If you found out your diplomat handled himself this way would you keep him as your diplomat?
(the questions are hypothetical to all players who don't lead alliances)