wow its been days since anyone has posted anything lmao is PI really that inactive all i know what is going on is rebellion and GoP are kicking some butt. Is that really all that is going on?:\
guardians of pi btw. and really because we have jumped up to 8th in alliances. all thx to phoenixs revenge and them giving us their cities with little resistance
Part of the problem is that every alliance seems to have 2 or 3 alliances. It cuts down on the amount of factions greatly which reduces the amount of conflict that is created. Sure leaders pat themselves on their backs and congratulate themselves for the great job they do at inviting players, and we all know the wonderful reasons they have..... people should question WHY any player would be willing to accept being a second class citizen of a group, in the hopes of eating some scrapes of the main group! Sad thing is I know most will argue against this post because they support this weak practice.... but why try to have more wars when you can feel safe and secure making 4 alliances and ensure your food source with internal eating???
The fact people eat internals directly reduces the amount of war and conflict, if most cities players had to take were other alliance members, more conflict would emerge, more conflict would lead to more forum posts. Eating internals will never lead to war, eating another alliances inactives might. More factions = more conflict = more forum posts. Pretty simple. The action of creating extra alliances is absolutly anti war which is anti forum.
I know every world is different, but that hasn't been my experience at all. Alpha turned into a world with only 3 very large factions, and there was plenty of conflict. I've also found that the heavier the fighting, the less people talk on the external forum. More factions =! more conflict and more conflict =! more forum posts. You really shouldn't speak in absolutes when you're just making assertions.
My original post in here had not mentioned your alliance, and was not aimed at your alliance. I was discussing this about the topic this forum is about and my theory of less alliance = less wars= less forum posts. You made this about your alliance, not me. Yours is hardly the only alliance with multiple alliances. Sorry YOU took my original post as a personal attack on you, you seem touchy. also, my post was not saying whether or not the strategy was a good game strategy or not, it was strictly about the threads subject. You made this about you and your alliance, at no time did I talk about you guys until YOU made it about you.
Funny, you seem to think it is ok to insult me personally implying I am unbalanced and need drugs, but for me to speak ill of your alliance is completely off limits. one is the game, one is a personal insult. Amazing that you think the game talk is unacceptable in a game forum, but personal insults are.
I also did not come "out of the woodworks" since you were responding to my post, maybe you are unfamiliar with that term but you used it incorrectly there. Should I now insult your intelligence on a personal level, maybe suggest you get some schooling? or possibly use the internet to research phrase before you use them? Is that acceptable since you did that to me?