wow its been days since anyone has posted anything lmao is PI really that inactive all i know what is going on is rebellion and GoP are kicking some butt. Is that really all that is going on?:\
Thanks to Psycho King "mouthing off" in the world forums, the old Phoenixs Revenge made new Alliance Pacts/Friends. We are now Vendettas Dragons, a Brother Alliance to Vendetta. And as we predicted to Guardians of Pi's War Leader Malchinius, he has now been left in the dust with barely an alliance left while hernandezderek1 took his Alliance Hopping bunch to the new Pi Optimus Maximus along with his gold playing prize, BLKZEUS1, which is really what he wanted from GoP all along. And no one is taking cities from your bunch of Alliance hoppers? Well, we took a city from BLKZEUS1 and then we had a couple of days of a truce, which, of course, GoP/POM broke with spying and "false attacks" to check attack times, and continuing to attack other small alliances which had been included in the truce. So now today, we took a city from Matt24 and we seem to have one of YOUR cities in revolt, PK. Should we take it or just farm it?? Which would you prefer?guardians of pi btw. and really because we have jumped up to 8th in alliances. all thx to phoenixs revenge and them giving us their cities with little resistance
I can see where you're getting at, but it depends on how the alliance works together in order to accomplish shared goals. A lot of reasons make up for the solution of having multiple alliances. You nailed one of them right on the head. Internal feeding. This game is 22 months long. . . and I guarantee you the thousands that play in this one world are not going to be active at WW. So, you filter in strong players while consuming the inactive. You refuel your alliance. Move people up from the second alliance. . . and so forth.Part of the problem is that every alliance seems to have 2 or 3 alliances. It cuts down on the amount of factions greatly which reduces the amount of conflict that is created. Sure leaders pat themselves on their backs and congratulate themselves for the great job they do at inviting players, and we all know the wonderful reasons they have..... people should question WHY any player would be willing to accept being a second class citizen of a group, in the hopes of eating some scrapes of the main group! Sad thing is I know most will argue against this post because they support this weak practice.... but why try to have more wars when you can feel safe and secure making 4 alliances and ensure your food source with internal eating???
Do you actually play this game? All I've seen from you is rant, rant and more rants. Mate, the most we have had are three alliances, so get your facts straight - - and we filtered it all out. I hate having to explain myself to you, because for some sad reason, you have this personal vendetta against our alliance and whatever I say makes you have to respond with some personal argument. It drives me nuts. Or is it me? Did I hurt your feelings or something? Whatever I do always has strategy behind it. Pipe down and watch the show mate. We'll see if everything was smart or irrelevant by end game, eh? So far, everything has worked out pretty damn well.The fact people eat internals directly reduces the amount of war and conflict, if most cities players had to take were other alliance members, more conflict would emerge, more conflict would lead to more forum posts. Eating internals will never lead to war, eating another alliances inactives might. More factions = more conflict = more forum posts. Pretty simple. The action of creating extra alliances is absolutly anti war which is anti forum.
My post was about this world at this time. Not an end game scenario where only active players are left. From my experience forums are most active when PR will work on the less experienced players in wars, which tends to be when there are more alliances. I agree when mainly only the active players are left and fighting, they fight in game and not pr fights in the forum.I know every world is different, but that hasn't been my experience at all. Alpha turned into a world with only 3 very large factions, and there was plenty of conflict. I've also found that the heavier the fighting, the less people talk on the external forum. More factions =! more conflict and more conflict =! more forum posts. You really shouldn't speak in absolutes when you're just making assertions.
. . . I used my alliance as an example. If I would have used someone else's alliance, I would have probably been called a hypocrite by your judgmental fingers. Then you came out of the woodworks with, "WELL SINCE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT YOUR ALLIANCE, RAH RAH RAH." Sweet Jesus. There are these things that doctors prescribe. It's called medicine. Some can be called "chill pills", at least that's the slang for it, y'know? Take one. :|My original post in here had not mentioned your alliance, and was not aimed at your alliance. I was discussing this about the topic this forum is about and my theory of less alliance = less wars= less forum posts. You made this about your alliance, not me. Yours is hardly the only alliance with multiple alliances. Sorry YOU took my original post as a personal attack on you, you seem touchy. also, my post was not saying whether or not the strategy was a good game strategy or not, it was strictly about the threads subject. You made this about you and your alliance, at no time did I talk about you guys until YOU made it about you.
LOL. Go for it mate. Insult my intelligence. All I know is that I play this game during my free time while I'm enrolled in a top-10 college in the United States while arguing with a kid who uses a forum to finally be heard by anyone for once in his life. Go on buddy, what kind of insults do you have in your pocket? That's right, unwrap that piece of paper and give it your best shot. I'm all eyes.Funny, you seem to think it is ok to insult me personally implying I am unbalanced and need drugs, but for me to speak ill of your alliance is completely off limits. one is the game, one is a personal insult. Amazing that you think the game talk is unacceptable in a game forum, but personal insults are.
I also did not come "out of the woodworks" since you were responding to my post, maybe you are unfamiliar with that term but you used it incorrectly there. Should I now insult your intelligence on a personal level, maybe suggest you get some schooling? or possibly use the internet to research phrase before you use them? Is that acceptable since you did that to me?