No not an academy. They looked very promising up to where they took in 10+ Ex Warlords and now are starting to "steal" players from other groups. Sadly they are beginning to look very much like Warlords 2.0
Lets see if version 2.0 does better than 1.0.
What you fail to see (or maybe you do see it and this is your problem) is the major difference between WG and Infamous.
First off WG leadership was rubbish, they were led by one player that wasn't fit to lead a dead pack of mice. Greek was the only one that fell for the BS you and Oliver schemed up, the rest of us, even the other council members were against that deal because we saw right through it. To compare Infamous to WG is so laughable it's sad, we are total opposites of WG and soon you will realize this. You know I had no problem stating my disgust for the deal in the shared forum between anti and WG and you failed to answer any of my questions there, you only told me I had no say so in the matter. Truth is you and Oliver knew I saw through the BS.
As far as taking in 10+ ex-WG goes, they came to us either by recommendation or messaging leadership wanting to join us. Now lets look at this. They were all outside our core by a good bit, but yet THEY decided they wanted to join us. Out of all the alliances in their general area, they choose us and all the relocation that came with those decisions....That should tell you how they felt about anti and the other alliances in their area.
We do not STEAL players from anyone, who ever we invite come to us wanting to be part of the best alliance in Sparta, and they must be up to our standards, it's just that simple.....Sorry to blow your theory of WG 2.0....We are Infamous, the one and only!