Since when did we NEED to pact with anyone to go against you? Our group has been at odds with yours since day one. The only difference is now the attacks are one-sided. Hence my previous statement.
And could you PLEASE explain how you got to the point where the attacks were one sided?
Please stop contradicting yourself. We were doing great before you guys started pacting with the top alliances of the world. And you accuse US of trying to pact with anybody willing to listen...look at yourself first.
And don't blame players for leaving as cowards, you don't know what goes on in their life, remember this just a game. A game that isn't fun for either of us sitting here looking at each other, when it clearly is a stalemate. Keep telling yourself that we're sinking, but when was the last time you took an important city of ours that wasn't a) an internal or b) an inactive? I'm sure we stopped about every attempt.
And we weren't the ones that looked for a pact to fight against you, it was the opposite way around. We never contacted Mercs because we took 19/19 (100%) of their cities back in July and made a number of players quit. We will never agree but the way I see it, and the way us leaders see it, is that you couldn't take us on one by one and had to resort to a world coalition.
But I'm sure before Mumluks even get close, something will give sooner or later.