DeletedUser2568
Guest
Sarah Morgan told me she would post more if she had her own thread to express her opinions about Zeta. I am trying to expedite her posting by creating the thread for her!!
Sarah you have been extremely quiet? No opinions to share?
I apologize for not responding to such an honor as being given my very own thread. And props to trav for hitting some of my views so correct in my absence!!
I am wondering about what some people think about the way things are going in Zeta. I mean by all means, I will not sugar coat and try to say that TEE has not had quite the diverse set of issues in this world, nor will I sit back and make excuses for our circumstances. But this is what I am curious about from the masses:
This is a war game (although I believe there are a few to many that cannot make the distinction that this is not real). But that being said, I really question the morality of many players here in Zeta. I mean, if you are unable to take over an enemies cities in general (of active players that is) then apparently you are not as good as you are claiming. And while there are no rules in warfare I would think there would still be morality. I may be both blonde, and a female but I am not stupid or gullible. My objection and question concerns the morals of taking in defectors. Either you really are afraid that you cannot beat us, or you want to use them for information. I would simply have told people that if it is that bad where you are then you should weigh your options, but taking in enemies just to gain an upper hand would not be an option, oh wait that's right I have already been doing that silly me I guess I do have blonde moments!!
I will not say that the alliance has never taken in a defector. But since "world war" my views are if you cannot handle where you are then what is the point in jumping ship. I mean really, if an alliance was good enough for you before then why leave just because it is getting hard? That is a cowardice way of dealing with things and I do not agree with an alliance condoning such actions. And since you stated that they came to you not the other way around, then you are to blame for the general action of allowing such events. Although again this is just a war game and there are no rules to war. Also, I have never accused you of taking them for information, and commend you for not doing it that way. But even if the info is not expressly communicated it is still used in a sense. I mean you now have people that will plan ops in your alliance based on their prior intel and the alliance will then learn from that.
I will not say that the alliance has never taken in a defector. But since "world war" my views are if you cannot handle where you are then what is the point in jumping ship. I mean really, if an alliance was good enough for you before then why leave just because it is getting hard? That is a cowardice way of dealing with things and I do not agree with an alliance condoning such actions. And since you stated that they came to you not the other way around, then you are to blame for the general action of allowing such events. Although again this is just a war game and there are no rules to war.
Also, I have never accused you of taking them for information, and commend you for not doing it that way. But even if the info is not expressly communicated it is still used in a sense. I mean you now have people that will plan ops in your alliance based on their prior intel and the alliance will then learn from that.