New World

DeletedUser13502

Guest
Thoughts, Ideas, request for world settings?? We have another world coming soon, it theoretically should be a CQ world as revolt just had 2 open, but open to suggestions from you all as to what the players would like.
 

DeletedUser15839

Guest
I'd say same settings as US41 Rethymnos. Those were good. It should bring in a fairly good amount of people too
 

DeletedUser15974

Guest
A speed world, speed 4 or 6
No moral, because moral is evil
No BN because it's fun
 

DeletedUser15567

Guest
Speed 3 conquest no moral no night bonus high cap (75+)
 

DeletedUser11440

Guest
3/3 Conquest no moral 50 cap sounds awesome

and no night bonus ofc
 

DeletedUser15839

Guest
Medic, sounds like people want another us41. That was a great world and full of fun. Let's do it!
 

DeletedUser15981

Guest
I think world speed 4 or 6 and units speed 3 or 4 with no morale and no night bonus would be ideal !
 
Rodrk

Rodrk

Peltast
Anyone as impressed with the 2 revolt worlds that opened as i am? 2 at the same time = bad decision. They both appear to be dead. Gonnos was embarrassingly lame and i hear the speed 2 that opened is all but decided when it comes to winners and losers. So we'll wait for another revolt. I hope people don't decide to walk away over the next few months.

Better consider those settings carefully when it does come out, i don't think grepo can survive another clunker revolt world like the last 2
 

DeletedUser15839

Guest
Rodrk said:
Anyone as impressed with the 2 revolt worlds that opened as i am? 2 at the same time = bad decision. They both appear to be dead. Gonnos was embarrassingly lame and i hear the speed 2 that opened is all but decided when it comes to winners and losers. So we'll wait for another revolt. I hope people don't decide to walk away over the next few months.

Better consider those settings carefully when it does come out, i don't think grepo can survive another clunker revolt world like the last 2
Click to expand...

People aren't walking away because of this decision. Those worlds were poorly populated yes because TWO opened at the same time. BUT people are leaving because of the hugathon diplomacy that's now rampant in this game.

Gone are the old days when there was TRUE diplomacy based on needs of the team and ideals and goals to win wars and the game itself. Now, everyone just forms coalitions and "brotherhoods" and war everyone who isn't part of their own hugathon.

And vets like us, hate it. Because it's entirely counterproductive to war and the original intent behind the game and its foundations. May be a good strategy, but it always ends in massive drama and people leave and ghost out. Poorest way to go about a world
 

stevehazelnuttehepic

Taxiarch
Sigurd The Unbroken said:
Gone are the old days when there was TRUE diplomacy based on needs of the team and ideals and goals to win wars and the game itself. Now, everyone just forms coalitions and "brotherhoods" and war everyone who isn't part of their own hugathon.
Click to expand...

I know. Eubea is/was a hugathon. There are currently 4 alliances of 40 members each that are all under the same name, who allied with the next two biggest alliances. Although we think that those two alliances are sniping us, so that may start a war.

Edit: Nvm the Eubea hugfest ended, the alliances are now in a state of open warfare after the 2 alliances tried to MR the 4 alliances.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top