Recent content by stevehazelnuttehepic

You didn't exist at the time of the post.

If memory recalls, all beta worlds are under the beta branch rather than regional servers like US, EU, etc. I don't have an account on the beta branch to check, but you can probably find the world at this link if you login and look at the open servers.

When then you're penalizing normal tactics as well. I typically seastorm twice in quick succession if I have my daily favor sitting around.

That's what happens when you know how to win, but your opponents don't know how to lose.

Davinar being eaten already? WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW TITANS?

Avengers, Bad News Bears, and maybe Honey Badgers. Everyone else isn't bother mentioning.

It should at a minimum be 30. In other news, have this hilarious screenshot.

But Scot, everyone knows lower alliance caps mean there'll be less sister alliances :O

A cap of 125 would mean a grand total of less than 3 alliances a month into the world.

The world settings for this are terrible, so I wish you luck. The 2 top alliances both have 2 branches already and the 3rd top is gold farming.

Trading for resources would be faaaaaar too powerful. Oh you're sending a CS at me? Let me trade tons of resources/gold so I can seastorm you 40 times in quick succession and kill all the LS. As for trading favor, that could still be used to just hide favor for gods by making trades that no one...

Oh, didn't realize that Inno allowing me to have advisors was making this for heavy golders only. Guess I'll die.

In defense of this, if you want to found a city next to an opponent's WW island they have every right to stonehail it out of existence.

Personally I'm 100% fine with this because it'll anger dan even more lmao.

They made several mistakes, including but not limited to 1) MMing TBC right before WWs and trying to get them to flip sides with the promise of a crown they couldn't keep 2) Attacking people who weren't online during fills to get them online to help 3) They took in sinkingdan, thereby forcing me...