Trash Talk

DeletedUser13151

Guest
Tbom9 said:
Don't pat yourself on the back too hard - In Lex's last 209 sieges, only 1 of them has been on YG (See, two can play that game
smiley_emoticons_auslachen2.gif
)
Click to expand...
From that ratio alone, it's obvious we haven't been targeting you yet:D

But clearly, you all have been trying pretty hard on us:p
What was that...a YG OP attempt on 5 cities(emphasis on attempt)...how many succeeded?...zero.

Just another brilliant day by Young strategists ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser13151

Guest
JoesphGuy said:
Oops

I mean, I can send a CS. What city you want it at?
Click to expand...
If you can manage, I'd love an attempt on all of my cities simultaneously, but if you can't coordinate that...just pick any city.

But, This is nothing new...I've been saying this for weeks...beginning to fear you are only able to CQ cities from inactives:(
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser13151

Guest
Grepo Mauler said:
Lets try another siege soon.... Myth hungry again... And Maul only lost 1 nuke of his 9.... Please note this world not about this Maul life
Click to expand...
Sure, who would you like me to target? Aside from the city we already have in siege...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser10179

Guest
Lady De Carla said:
From that ratio alone, it's obvious we haven't been targeting you yet:D

But clearly, you all have been trying pretty hard on us:p
What was that...a YG OP attempt on 5 cities(emphasis on attempt)...how many succeeded?...zero.

Just another brilliant day by Young strategists ;)
Click to expand...

Yes, instead you have been targeting alliance-less players and players who are in smaller, helpless alliances. This is because you very well know the extent of what you can't do, and you know very well that taking a city from us when we have knowledge of it is downright impossible. So I encourage you to target us as you claim you haven't been and feed us some more BP.

Lady De Carla said:
If you can manage, I'd love an attempt on all of my cities simultaneously, but if you can't coordinate that...just pick any city.

But, This is nothing new...I've been saying this for weeks...beginning to fear you are only able to CQ cities from inactives:(
Click to expand...

Now you say this, yet your entire alliance can't manage to hold a siege against ONE of our cities on a predominantly LEX island. Not to mention the city had a level 16 wall. I think you realize that you can't afford to go after our cities anymore, well... if you were smart you would realize that, and I think everyone very well knows there is a good chance that you wont realize that because you are a walking argument for birth control.
 

DeletedUser13151

Guest
XpertGreek said:
Yes, instead you have been targeting alliance-less players and players who are in smaller, helpless alliances. This is because you very well know the extent of what you can't do, and you know very well that taking a city from us when we have knowledge of it is downright impossible. So I encourage you to target us as you claim you haven't been and feed us some more BP.
Click to expand...
LOL, IWe are beating several major alliance coalitions...simultaneously- at least, you would know that if you read stats :p
We've had alot of strong CQs on your Active Members. You tried to snipe us and couldn't. So, Instead of making actual strategies, you resort to golding 3 waves flier nukes, 2 cat nukes, and 3 full OLU nukes- for 1 siege break. The event is over...the party is over...your flyers will disappear, and we will stack you...;)

Now you say this, yet your entire alliance can't manage to hold a siege against ONE of our cities on a predominantly LEX island. Not to mention the city had a level 16 wall. I think you realize that you can't afford to go after our cities anymore, well... if you were smart you would realize that, and I think everyone very well knows there is a good chance that you wont realize that because you are a walking argument for birth control.
Click to expand...
Lol,
I'll admit we won't compete against tertiary opponents who have such poor leadership that they wait until an event to buy all their defenses with actual money :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser13151

Guest
XpertGreek said:
Now you say this, yet your entire alliance can't manage to hold a siege against ONE of our cities on a predominantly LEX island. Not to mention the city had a level 16 wall. I think you realize that you can't afford to go after our cities anymore, well... if you were smart you would realize that, and I think everyone very well knows there is a good chance that you wont realize that because you are a walking argument for birth control.
Click to expand...
Time for honesty, Young guns has only a few people who actually do anything...the rest are die-hard simmers. And that really hurts coming from an alliance claiming to have "selective membership"...

Lol "Walking argument for birth control":D
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser10179

Guest
Lady De Carla said:
Let's be honest, your alliance has only a few people actually participating...the rest are die-hard simmers. And that really hurts coming from an alliance claiming to have "selective membership"

Lol "Walking argument for birth control":D
Click to expand...

NOW that statement was very hypocritical.
 

DeletedUser13151

Guest
XpertGreek said:
It is just a game, and it was just a joke ;)
Click to expand...
What you said was kinda too serious for a joke, but I took it well. ;)

However, you got one thing right...this is just a game
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser1048

Guest
MetalCore said:
Fair enough, personally I don't like trash talk, but I understand why people do. We're all just people who like playing grep, and enemies you have now will probably be your allies on another world and vice versa. Sounds a bit too corny for my liking, but you get the point
Click to expand...

You mean Coreny...ok yeah that wasn't as good as it sounded in my head.
 

DeletedUser1048

Guest
Lady De Carla said:
Lol, Only simmers have time to make puns:D

Kidding
Click to expand...

It hurts to see troops lost. To think of all the children that might grow up without their dad is very sad. So yeah I stick to making pretty cities. I can make your's pretty if you want?

All it takes is parking a CS in your city for 12 hours. They spend that time decorating the city. When that's over it will look brand new.
 

DeletedUser16136

Guest
Joseph Nieves said:
It hurts to see troops lost. To think of all the children that might grow up without their dad is very sad. So yeah I stick to making pretty cities. I can make your's pretty if you want?
Click to expand...
You think your a good simmer? I'm way better. My cities are the prettiest!
 

DeletedUser13151

Guest
Joseph Nieves said:
It hurts to see troops lost. To think of all the children that might grow up without their dad is very sad. So yeah I stick to making pretty cities. I can make your's pretty if you want?

All it takes is parking a CS in your city for 12 hours. They spend that time decorating the city. When that's over it will look brand new.
Click to expand...
Lol,

Lex doesn't like to spend time decorating. Our troops just like to visit to sample the food:p
 

DeletedUser1048

Guest
Lady De Carla said:
Lol,

Lex doesn't like to spend time decorating. Our troops just like to visit to sample the food:p
Click to expand...

So I've heard, it takes Lady Mad's militia 3 hours to eat breakfast. Might be good for the hot dog eating contest but that's about it.
 

DeletedUser11833

Guest
Lady De Carla said:
From that ratio alone, it's obvious we haven't been targeting you yet:D

But clearly, you all have been trying pretty hard on us:p
What was that...a YG OP attempt on 5 cities(emphasis on attempt)...how many succeeded?...zero.

Just another brilliant day by Young strategists ;)
Click to expand...

Those 209 sieges are your successful sieges. You've targeted us plenty, just cant make anything stick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top